Culture in Their Eyes Were Watching God and in The Souls of Black Folks
Introduction
Culture is a very complicated notion and it can hardly be perceived absolutely
identically by different people. Sometimes the views on culture may be even
quite opposite. At this respect the views of DuBois and Hurston are quite good
examples of the opposite attitude to cultural values. In their works “Their
Eyes Were Watching God” and “The Souls of Black Folks”, respectively,
the authors raise a kind of dilemma of the role of high culture and folk culture.
On the one hand, DuBois underlines the necessity of the development of high
culture, which he perceives as essential condition of effective development
of the society leading to real equality, while Hurston affirms the strength
of folk culture and its importance for people.
Views of Hurston as opposing to views of DuBois
On comparing the views of Hurston and DuBois, it is possible to say that they
are common at least in one point, namely they pay a lot of attention to culture
and it is an essential part of human existence and normal and happy life. In
fact according to them, culture is a moving force of a person’s progress
and whether individuals are willing or not they have to deal with culture as
a very important and often determining factor in their lives.
In the same time, on analyzing deeper, it will be easy to find that the views
of DuBois and Hurston, which make their attitude to culture quite different
in their perception of culture and its entity since DuBois underlines the great
role of high culture while Hurston is rather concerned about folk culture.
In such a situation, it would probably be better to support this statement with
the analysis of the two works mentioned above where a lot of evidences supporting
the statement may be found.
Speaking about Hurston’s “Their Eyes Were Watching God”, it
should be said that the basic idea concerning the culture is the belief of the
great role of folk culture as the basis of the society. The protagonist of the
novel, Jamie is a girl who attempts to go beyond traditional and conservative
culture of her country and her people. From the beginning she has to obey to
the rules and norms of the community so even her first husband was chosen by
her grandmother and there is nothing unusual or shocking for people surrounding
her and eventually he marries Logan but soon she realizes that he is not a man
she could live with.
Obviously she tends to overcome stereotypes, probably this is why she likes
Joe Starks, “a citified, stylish dressed man with his hat sat at an angle
that didn’t belong at these parts” (Hurston). Latter on she decides
to marry him and go to Eatonville. In the same time, the depiction of Joe Starks
and tendency of Jamie to contradict to a certain extent to folk culture is quite
symbolic and only emphasizes the strength of folk culture as a decisive force
in a person’s life.
By the way such a tendency of Jamie leads to her isolation from the rest of
the community, even her closest friend Phoeby needs some explanations of her
life.
Nonetheless, Jamie keeps folk traditions and culture. She remains obedient to
her husband even despite the fact that their life becomes unbearable. She is
often bitten by her husband but the power of old traditions and folk culture
is so significant that she cannot leave him and change her life dramatically.
The death of Joe is a great relief for her but still she has to show her grief
and she “starches and irons her face” (Hurston) for funerals.
In fact until the moment she gets acquainted with Tea Cake she leads “grandma’s
way of life”, which she dose not like. She says: “Dis ain’t
no business proposition, and no race after property and titles. Dis is uh love
game. Ah done lived Grandma’s way, now ah means to live mine” (Hurston).
But even such a kind of rebellion against traditions and cultural norms of the
town’s community scares her. In the same time her new life is emphatically
simple and corresponds to folk culture symbolizing a kind of ideal life when
a person leads simple life in accordance with folk culture. The latter may be
treated as an author’s ideal everyone has to strive for.
Quite different view on culture may be found in the work “The Souls of
Black Folks” by DuBois. In this work the author basically concerns on
the problem of racial discrimination and lack of equality between white and
black communities in the US. In the same time DuBois is close to Hurston in
the idea of the great role of culture and at this respect the works analyzed
are similar but what make them absolutely incompatible is the attitude of both
authors to the culture. If Hurston, as it has already been found out, basically
believes in the power of the folk culture than DuBois stands on the ground of
the necessity to develop high culture. To put it more precisely she underlines
the necessity to integrate black population into achievements of high culture
and vice versa since she believes that the culture of African Americans has
a really great potential.
In fact DuBois insist that economic prosperity and social stability is useless
without cultural integration since, according to him for every individual “the
end of his striving: to be a co-worker in the kingdom of culture, to escape
both death and isolation, to husband and to use his best powers and his latent
genius” (DuBois). In such a way the development and accessibility of high
culture to every individual is considered to be essential for normal social
life.
Furthermore, the author warns against the lack of high culture saying that “by
the poverty and ignorance of his people, the Negro minister or doctor was tempted
toward quackery and demagogy; and by the criticism of the other world, toward
ideals that made him ashamed of his lowly tasks” (DuBois). Obviously the
author sees in high culture the way of development of great civilization.
Like Hurston, DuBois underlines that an individual cannot live in isolation
from the rest of the society with its moral norms and cultural traditions but
he rather speaks about more sophisticated things than Hurston does, for instance
his idea of double consciousness, “this sense of always looking at one’s
self through the eyes of others, of measuring one’s soul by the tape of
a world that looks on in amused contempt and pity” (DuBois). Consequently
DuBois treats culture on the level of sophisticated psychological processes
while Hurston tends to treat culture as a set of norms and traditions that had
existed for decades and that a person has to obey by individual’s nature,
as if culture is a kind of unwritten law.
A significant place in the cultural development of an individual DuBois leaves
for education, which is an engine of culture and knowledge promotion, or as
the author defines its goal to be “an organ of that fine adjustment between
real life and the growing knowledge of life, an adjustment that makes the secret
of civilization” (DuBois). The author also speaks about accessibility
and necessity to get high education for all people. At this respect universities
should play a great role since “the function of the university is not
simply to teach bread-winning, or to furnish teachers for the public schools
or to be a center of polite society” (DuBois) but it should teach the
real life and provide knowledge in order to make people really equal.
Probably this is the idea that can hardly be found in Hurston work, since in
“Their Eyes Were Watching God” folk culture is on the first place
and folk culture is very conservative and does not accept some revolutionary
changes that DuBois offers or the development of education, for instance, which
is not considered as absolutely essential in folk tradition.
Conclusion
Thus, taking into consideration all above mentioned, it is possible to say that
despite superficial similarities between the works of Hurston and DuBois the
only main similarity is the importance of culture but their views on culture
remain quite different. Naturally, one may contradict that culture is too complicated
phenomenon that cannot be perceived universally in the same way but, being quite
reasonable, such statement is hardly applicable for the case of Hurston and
DuBois views on culture. In fact it is obvious that the former is rather concerned
on folk culture and sustaining of old traditions that implies certain conservatism,
while the latter claims to revolutionize the conservative attitude to culture
and develop high culture that could be accessible to all people and such culture
have all opportunities to become a force uniting all people of a definite country
and the whole world.
Bibliography:
1. DuBois, W.E.B. The Souls of Black Folk. New York: McGraw Hill, 1999.
2. Hurston, Z.N. Their Eyes Were Watching God. New York: Touchstone, 2000.


