Advertising is an essential part of contemporary trade and business this is
why it is vitally important for any company to be successful in it. Actually,
there are a lot of examples when a properly advertised product gained the world
acclaim and became very popular and attracting for consumers.
Naturally positive results could be hardly achieved without a wise and properly
organized advertising campaign. In fact it is not an easy task to fulfill to
promote a product on the market especially if it is some specific product. Nonetheless
there are no limits for a wise advertiser, finally it is possible to sell any
product you need, the only thing this product needs is good promotion or advertising.
In this paper, I would focus on a traditional market and a classical advertising
sample. So, it would be a brief analysis of the advertising campaign hold by
Nissan in order to promote its Infiniti.
From the beginning it should be said that Nissan has recognized two basic principles
characterizing their clients. before discussing them it should be said a few
words about the progress made by Nissan and other Japanese companies in American
market. In the early 1980s the Japanese share of the US automobile market constituted
only 20% while by the end of the 1980s its figure has become really striking.
Such a tremendous success was conditioned partially by a good advertising. The
latter in its turn was the result of the recognition of two basic principles:
all of the members of that segment tend to get older; and some (more precisely
a good percentage) of the market will eventually into a higher income bracket.
So, what was so special in Nissan’s advertising campaign that provided
the company with positive results? First of all it should be said that Infiniti
advertising was characterized by a good organization and a high degree of originality.
The company chose for the Infinity campaign a Zen Philosophy-like style. As
a result natural scenes with trees, rocks and flowers were amply used.
However, unlike its Japanese competitors Nissan’s Infiniti advertising
campaign was recognized as not very successful for Infiniti’s sales only
reached 1,723 cars for the first year. Moreover, consumers were simply confused
by the advertising and it even became a brunt of jokes by Jay Leno and David
Letterman. It is obvious that it is necessary to analyze the mistakes that were
made by Nissan.
It should be said that for a success of any product that is advertised it is
vitally important to take into consideration four key elements, four levels
of consumer’s involvement.
The first level is Extended Problem Solving. This level occurs when a consumer
is inexperienced in a particular consumption setting or buying situation yet
finding its setting to be interesting and highly involving. It is a deliberate
decision-making process that includes the explicit need recognition, careful
internal and external search a thorough evaluation of alternatives, and a lengthy
and involved post-purchased evaluation.
In the case of Infiniti Nissan was obviously only on its way to invade the market
of the US. Naturally it could not have enough information about the real needs
of American consumers. Moreover, the company could simply underestimate its
main competitors, including Toyota’s Lexus, which operated within the
same segment of the market. The company also needed to gain the recognition
of the American consumers that was not an easy task.
The next level is Limited Problem Solving, which implies a low experience and
involvement of the consumer. The consumer will be less systematic in his or
her decision making process. The information search is usually limited to the
first brand that the consumer encounters in that particular product category.
At this level of involvement, the consumer is simply seeking adequate solutions
to mundane, everyday problems. An example of this may be a purchase of Pampers
shortly after the new mother receives a complementary package of them when she
leaves the hospital. It also could be the result of receiving a trial offer
or a discount coupon.
Probably Nissan Infiniti’s campaign was just hold in the wrong time since
the need was not so significant as it actually should be for a successful introduction
of a new automobile in the market.
Not less important is the level of Habit or Variety Seeking. Traditionally a
habit purchase occurs when the decision is uninvolving and a consumer simply
purchases the same brand from the product category over and over again. Habitual
purchases are one of the most common types of the decision-making mode, but
it is necessary to remember that habits may be disrupted.
Actually it is exactly what Nissan has to be done for, as I has already been
mentioned at the beginning of the 1980s Japanese companies’ share was
about a quarter of the general American market, consequently Nissan’s
share was even less significant. In such a condition American consumers would
rather buy a traditional American car than a Japanese one.
However Nissan also had a chance because Variety Seeking occurs when a consumer
has a tendency to switch brands to avoid the boredom and routine of habitual
buying. But despite this fact the consumers still choose from their original
consideration set of alternatives.
Finally, Brand Loyalty is extremely important particularly in the contemporary
business. In this level, there is high involvement and a very rich prior experience
history that Nissan obviously lacked at that time. However, once gained it will
be very effective especially in the advertising campaigns since it is based
on highly favorable attitudes toward the brand, a conscious commitment on the
part of the consumer to find this brand each time the consumer purchases from
this category, and it provides high emotional benefits for the consumer.
Thus, taking into consideration all above mentioned, it is possible to conclude
that Extended Problem Solving, Habit or Variety Seeking, Limited Problems and
Brand Loyalty are extremely important for the market success of any advertising
campaign and any product. However, the advertising of Nissan Infiniti discussed
in terms of this paper turned to be ineffective since not all of the modes mentioned
above could be objectively realized in that time in the market of the US by
this company.
Bibliography:
1. Klein, Sage. Advertising and Consumer Behavior. New York: Routeledge, 2001.